| A
New Focus for Investors
Technology
managers and venture investors by their nature are
generally optimists.
When a company struggles due to either market
or internal issues, it needs an injection of fresh
perspective and assistance.
Institutional private equity players and corporate
management of smaller remote divisions are often too
busy, conflicted or just unable to provide hands on
help to struggling companies.
LP surveys in late 2002 estimate that the “class
of ‘99” venture funds will return on average
only 50% of capital invested. A reset of expectations
and a fresh look on behalf of management teams, GPs
and LPs becomes essential in today’s environment.
Management incentives and skill matching are
being revisited.
Companies
that are characterized as “ the public walking
wounded” or private firms with multiple preferred
financing rounds that have missed plans often have
conflicting investor and management goals and responsibilities.
There is often great value that can be achieved
by a new direction, enhanced management, a fresh start
and a reinvigorated Board.
The robust technology M&A activity of the
past 10 years has also left many companies with non-strategic
and under-performing units that need change.
Within
the Abilene
Management Group's
market focus, the institutional venture community
funded over 10,000 new technology firms over the past
several years.
Add to that the participation of other private
and public firms, and couple that with the available
IPO market in even the best of times, it is clear
that a substantial gestation period and repositioning
for many firms is a necessity.
|
| Changing
Liquidity Horizon for Technology Firms
Sarbanes-Oxley
and the associated NYSE and NASDAQ requirements are
just at the early stage of being implemented.
While arguably targeted at the largest firms
in the US, an entire new body of law and practices
will evolve over the coming years that will trickle
down and affect the smaller public sector and with
it a portion of aggressive private firms.
Many of these firms are VC backed and have
relied on the public markets for growth.
The requirements for “real time”
disclosures, changes in option plans forced by regulation
and large public investors, coupled with the new law
that a company MUST be in full compliance upon
the filing of the initial S-1 with the SEC means substantial
infrastructure changes.
The company planning an IPO needs to get its
board committees set and staffed by “Independents”(which
many VC board members will fail to meet), and have
internal financial controls functioning a good year
before filing. For both private companies and existing
public firms, the minimum size for a viable quality
IPO and liquid market has gone up.
This change is a result of the substantial
costs of new compliance rules and D&O insurance.
Along with a path to building value and liquidity, acquisitions will help smaller firms get the scale and breadth of customers to enable lower disclosure financial risk, a critical concept on which the new regulations focus heavily. To manage the risk effectively, a SWAT team approach including management and outside independent assistance is a likely necessity to provide proper execution and compliance with audit committee guidelines. Success as VCs in the next decade will not be simply predicated on a return to the past practices but incorporate the new realities of the public market that are forever changed by responsiveness to the customer. The expectations of large investors, including the parent entities of leading LPs of VC funds, along with SEC oversight, have changed overnight and they have become a more informed, active and demanding group. |
| Unique experience base required Our
principals have successfully navigated firms through
meltdowns, restructurings, acquisition integration
and startups to create value. We have significant
experience in the new governance environment and the
resources to navigate through the pathway. The next
decade will see an increase in the opportunities for
superior returns for management and investors - requiring
remediation of many existing firms particularly those
with ”hard” technology and IP in the areas
of communications, optics, systems, Internet services
and software.
We selectively work with companies and Boards
that have a core set of assets and capabilities for
IP realization, remediation and will help manage the
company through the transformation process. |
|